PTE Summarize Written Text Task Sample 217

Read the passage below and summarize it using one sentence. Type your response in the box at the bottom of the screen. You have 10 minutes to finish this task. Your response will be judged on the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the key points in the passage.

Voting Rights for Incarcerated Individuals

The question of whether individuals serving prison sentences should retain their right to vote is a contentious issue that touches upon principles of democracy, justice, and rehabilitation.

Advocates argue that disenfranchising prisoners undermines the democratic ideals of representation and participation, perpetuating social exclusion and marginalization. Granting voting rights to incarcerated individuals can foster a sense of civic engagement, responsibility, and belonging, potentially aiding in their reintegration into society upon release.

However, opponents contend that individuals forfeit certain rights and privileges upon committing crimes, including the right to vote. They argue that voting is a civic responsibility reserved for law-abiding citizens and that allowing prisoners to vote could undermine the integrity of the electoral process. Furthermore, some argue that denying voting rights serves as a deterrent to criminal behavior.

Ultimately, the question of voting rights for incarcerated individuals involves complex considerations of justice, fairness, and societal values. While some advocate for restoring this fundamental right as a means of promoting rehabilitation and social inclusion, others maintain that it should be withheld as a consequence of criminal conduct.

The debate underscores the need for thoughtful deliberation and examination of the underlying principles at stake in shaping policies regarding the civic participation of incarcerated individuals.

Summary:

The debate over voting rights for incarcerated individuals hinges on principles of democracy and justice, with advocates emphasizing the importance of civic engagement and rehabilitation, while opponents argue that voting should be reserved for law-abiding citizens and could compromise the integrity of the electoral process.